Approved by the Union Cabinet on 18 May, 2006^th

Page No.

1 Key Environmental Challenges: Causes and Impacts      4

Objectives of the National Environment Policy      8 10 15

1. Preamble                                                                                   1 

Key Environmental Challenges: Causes and Impacts                             4

Objectives of the National Environment Policy                                     8

Principles                                                                                       10

Strategies and Actions                                                                   15

5.1. Regulatory Reforms                                                                     16

5.1.1. Revisiting the Policy and Legislative Framework                           16

5.1.2. Process Related Reforms                                                           17

5.1.3       Substantive Reforms                                                            18

Environment & Forest Clearances

Coastal areas

LMOs

Environmentally Sensitive Zones

Monitoring of Compliance

Use of Economic Principles in Environmental

Decision-making

5.2             Enhancing and Conserving Environmental Resources 22

5.2.1       Land Degradation                                                                22

5.2.2       Desert Ecosystems                                                               23

5.2.3      Forests and Wildlife                                                             24

Forests

Wildlife

5.2.4       Biodiversity, Traditional Knowledge and

Natural Heritage                                                                   27

5.2.5       Freshwater Resources                                                          28

Riversystems

Groundwater

Wetlands

5.2.6Mountain Ecosystems                                                    34

5.2.7Coastal Resources                                                          35

5.2.8Pollution Abatement                                                      36

Air Pollution

Water Pollution

Soil Pollution

Noise Pollution

5.2.9Conservation of Manmade Heritage                              40

5.2.10Climate Change                                                            41

5.3Environmental Standards, etc.                                          43

5.3.1Environmental Standards                                               43

5.3.2EMS, Ecolabeling and Certification                              44

5.4Clean Technologies and Innovation                                  46

5.5Environmental Awareness, Education,

and Information                                                                      47

5.6Partnerships and Stakeholder Involvement                       48

5.7Capacity Building                                                             49

5.8Research & Development                                                 50

5.9International Cooperation                                                 50

5.10Review of the Policy                                                       51

5.11Review of Implementation                                              51

6.Process of Formulation of this Policy                                 52

Acknowledgements

The National Environment Policy, 2006 is the outcome of extensive consultations with experts in different disciplines, Central Ministries, Members of Parliament, State Governments, Industry Associations, Academic and Research Institutions, Civil Society, NGOs and the Public. We acknowledge and appreciate the keen interest and concern with which they reviewed earlier drafts of this policy and offered inputs and feedback for its improvement. A great deal of published research literature has also been reviewed. We find ourselves unable to acknowledge the respondents individually, or provide specific citations of the literature. Many of them will, no doubt, recognize their contributions in the document.

National Environment Policy¹

1 Preamble

A diverse developing society such as ours provides numerous challenges in the economic, social, political, cultural, and environmental arenas. All of these coalesce in the dominant imperative of alleviation of mass poverty, reckoned in the multiple dimensions of livelihood security, health care, education, empowerment of the disadvantaged, and elimination of gender disparities.

The National Environment Policy seeks to extend the coverage, and fill in gaps that still exist, in light of p re s e n t k n o w l e d g e a n d accumulatedexperience.Itdoesnot displace, but builds on the earlier policies.

Sustainable development concerns in the sense of enhancement of human wellbeing, broadly conceived, are a recurring theme in India's developmentphilosophy.

The National Environment Policy….... is intended to mainstream environmental concerns in all development activities.

Across the political spectrum of the country there has been recognition of the vital role natural resources play in providing livelihoods, and securing lifesupport ecological services. In this perspective a need for a comprehensive policy statement has been evident for some time in order to infuse a common approach to the various sectoral and cross-sectoral, including fiscal, approaches to environmental management. As our development challenges have evolved^, and our understanding of the centrality of environmental concerns in development has sharpened, there is also a need to review the earlier objectives, policy instruments, and strategies.

This dynamic requires an evolving and flexible policy framework, with a built in system for monitoring and review, and where necessary, revision. Sustainable development concerns in the sense of enhancement of human well-being, broadly conceived, are a recurring theme in India's development philosophy. The present day consensus reflects three foundational aspirations: First, that human beings should be able to enjoy a decent quality of life; second, that humanity should become capable of respecting the finiteness of the biosphere; and third, that neither the aspiration for the good life, nor the recognition of biophysical limits should preclude the search for greater justice in the world.

For this to occur there is a need for balance and harmony between economic, social and environmental needs of the country . India also plays an important² role in several significant international initiatives concerned with the environment. It is a party to the key multilateral agreements, and recognises the interdependencies among, and transboundary character of, several environmental problems. The National Environment Policy (NEP) is also intended to be a statement of India's commitment to making a positive contribution to international efforts.

The National Environment Policy is a response to our national commitment to a clean environment, mandated in the Constitution in Articles 48 A and 51 A (g), strengthened by judicial interpretation of Article 21. It is recognized that maintaining a healthy environment is not the state's responsibility alone, but also that of every citizen. A spirit of partnership should thus be realized throughout the spectrum of environmental management in the country. While the state must galvanize its efforts, there should also be recognition by each individual - natural or institutional, of its responsibility towards maintaining and enhancing the quality of the environment.

The National Environment Policy has been motivated by the above considerations and is intended to mainstream environmental concerns in all development activities. It briefly describes the key environmental challenges currently and prospectively facing the country, the objectives of environment policy, normative principles underlying policy action, strategic themes for intervention, broad indications of the legislative and institutional development needed to accomplish the strategic themes, and mechanisms for implementation and review. It has been prepared through a process of extensive consultation with experts, as well as diverse stakeholders, and this process is also documented.

The dominant theme of this policy is that while conservation of environmental resources is necessary to secure livelihoods and well-being of all, the most secure basis for conservation is to ensure that people dependent on particular resources obtain better livelihoods from the fact of conservation, than from degradation of theresource.

Environmental degradation is a major causal factor in enhancing and perpetuating poverty, particularly among the rural poor, when such degradation impacts soil fertility, quantity and quality of water, air quality, forests, wildlifeand fisheries.

2 Key Environmental Challenges: Causes and Impacts

The key environmental challenges that the country faces relate to the nexus of environmental degradation with poverty in its many dimensions, and economic growth. These challenges are intrinsically connected with the state of environmental resources, such as land, water, air, and their flora and fauna. The proximate drivers of environmental degradation are population growth, inappropriate technology and consumption choices, and poverty, leading to changes in relations between people and ecosystems, and development activities such as intensive agriculture, polluting industry, and unplanned urbanisation. However, these factors give rise to environmental degradation only through deeper causal linkages, in particular, institutional failures, resulting in lack of clarity or enforcement of rights of access and use of environmental resources, policies which provide disincentives for environmental conservation (and which may have origins in the fiscal regime), market failures (which may be linked to shortcomings in the regulatory regimes), and governance constraints.

Environmental degradation is a major causal factor in enhancing and perpetuating poverty, particularly among the rural poor, when such degradation impacts soil fertility, quantity and quality of water, air quality, forests, wildlife and fisheries. The dependence of the rural poor, in particular, tribal societies, on their natural resources, especially biodiversity, is self-evident. Women in particular face greater adverse impacts of degradation of natural resources, being directly responsible for their collection and use, but rarely for their management. The commitment of time and effort in collection of these resources has a direct impact on the capacity of rural women to devote time to raising and educating children, enhancing their earning skills, or participating in gainful livelihoods.

The poor are also more vulnerable to loss of resilience in ecosystems . Large^[1]reductions in resilience may mean that the ecosystems, on which livelihoods are based, break down, causing distress. The loss of the environmental resource base can result in certain groups of people being made destitute, even if overall, the economy shows strong growth. Further, urban environmental degradation, through lack of (or inappropriate) waste treatment and sanitation, industry and transport related pollution, adversely impacts air, water, and soil quality, and differentially impacts the health of the urban poor. This, in turn, affects their capability to seek and retain employment, attend school, and enhances gender inequalities , all of which perpetuate poverty.^[2]

The loss of the environmental resource base can result in certain groups of people being made destitute, even if overall, the economy shows strong growth.

It is increasingly evident that poor environmental quality has adversely affectedhuman health.

Institutional failures, referring to unclear or insufficiently enforced rights of access to, and use of, environmental resources, result in environmental degradation.

resource base are neglected, an incorrect picture is obtained from conventional monetary estimates of national income. On the other hand, economic growth permits improvement in environmental quality by making available the necessary resources for environmental investments, and generating societal pressures for improved environmental behaviour, and institutional and policy change. Unsustainable consumption patterns, particularly in industrialized countries also have serious adverse impacts on the environment, both local, and global. The global impacts are largely manifest in developing countries, and further accentuate poverty.

It is increasingly evident that poor environmental quality has adversely affected human health. Environmental factors are estimated as being responsible in some cases for nearly 20 percent of the burden of disease in India, and a number of environment-health factors are closely linked with dimensions of poverty (e.g. malnutrition, lack of access to clean energy and water). It has been shown that interventions such as reducing indoor air pollution, protecting sources of safe drinking water, protecting soil from contamination, improved sanitation measures, and better public health governance, offer tremendous opportunities in reducing the incidence of a number of critical health problems. It is also evident that these environmental protection measures would be difficult to accomplish without extensive awareness raising, and education, on good practices with respect to public and private behaviour.

Institutional failures, referring to unclear or insufficiently enforced rights of access to, and use of, environmental resources, result in environmental degradation because third parties primarily experience impacts of such degradation, without cost to the persons responsible for the damage. Such rights, both community based and individual, are critical institutions mediating

the    relationships    between    humans    and   the   use   of   the    environment.

Traditionally, village commons water sources, grazing grounds, local forests, fisheries, etc., have been protected by local communities from overexploitation through various norms, which may include penalties for disallowed behaviour. These norms, may, however, be degraded through the very process of development, including urbanization, and population growth resulting from sharp reduction in mortality, and also through state actions which may create conditions for the strengthening of individual over communitarian rights, and in doing so allow market forces to press for change that has adverse environmental implications. If such access to the community resources under weakened norms continues, the resources would be degraded, and the livelihoods of the community would suffer.

Policy failures can emerge from various sources, including the use of fiscal instruments, such as explicit and implicit subsidies for the use of various resources, which provide incentives for excessive use of natural resources. Inappropriate policy can also lead to changes in commonly managed systems, with adverse environmental outcomes.

Another major set of challenges arises from emerging global environmental concerns such as climate change, stratospheric ozone depletion, and biodiversity loss. The key is to operationalize the principle of common but differentiated responsibility of countries in relation to these problems. Multilateral regimes and programmes responding to these global environmental issues must not adversely impact the development opportunities of developing countries. Further, the sharing of global natural resources must proceed only on the basis of equal sharing per-capita across all countries.

Policy failures can emerge from various sources, including the use of fiscalinstruments.

3 Objectives of the National Environment Policy

The principal Objectives of this policy are enumerated below. These Objectives relate to current perceptions of key environmental challenges. They may, accordingly, evolve over time:

1. ConservationofCriticalEnvironmentalResources:

To protect and conserve critical ecological systems and resources, and invaluable natural and man-made heritage, which are essential for lifesupport, livelihoods, economic growth, and a broad conception of human well-being.

1. 
   Intra-generationalEquity:LivelihoodSecurityforthePoor:

To ensure equitable access to environmental resources and quality for all sections of society, and in particular, to ensure that poor communities, which are most dependent on environmental resources for their livelihoods, are assured secure access to these resources.

1. Inter-generationalEquity:

To ensure judicious use of environmental resources to meet the needs and aspirations of the present and future generations.

1. Integration of Environmental Concerns in Economic and Social Development:

To integrate environmental concerns into policies, plans, programmes, and projects for economic and social development.

1. EfficiencyinEnvironmentalResourceUse:

To ensure efficient use of environmental resources in the sense of reduction in their use per unit of economic output, to minimize adverse environmental impacts.

1. EnvironmentalGovernance:

To apply the principles of good governance (transparency, rationality, accountability, reduction in time and costs, participation, and regulatory independence) to the management and regulation of use of environmental resources.

1. EnhancementofResourcesforEnvironmentalConservation:

To ensure higher resource flows, comprising finance, technology, management skills, traditional knowledge, and social capital, for environmental conservation through mutually beneficial multistakeholder partnerships between local communities, public agencies, the academic and research community, investors, and multilateral and bilateral development partners.

4 Principles

This policy has evolved from the recognition that only such development is sustainable, which respects ecological constraints, and the imperatives of justice. The Objectives stated above are to be realized through various strategic interventions by different public authorities at Central, State, and Local Government levels. They would also be the basis of diverse partnerships. These strategic interventions, besides legislation and the evolution of legal doctrines for realization of the Objectives, may be premised on a set of unambiguously stated Principles depending upon their relevance, feasibility in relation to costs, and technical and administrative aspects of their application. The following Principles, may accordingly, guide the activities of different actors in relation to this policy. Each of these Principles has an established genealogy in policy pronouncements, jurisprudence, international environmental law, or international State practice:

i.      Human Beings are at the Centre of Sustainable Development Concerns:

Human beings are at the centre of concerns for sustainable development. They are entitled to a healthy and productive life in harmony with nature. ii. TheRighttoDevelopment:

The right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.

1. Environmental Protection is an Integral part of the DevelopmentProcess:

In order to achieve sustainable development, environmental protection shall constitute an integral part of the development process and cannot be considered in isolation from it.

1. ThePrecautionaryApproach:

Where there are credible threats of serious or irreversible damage to key environmental resources, lack of full scientific certainty shall not be used as a reason for postponing cost-effective measures to prevent environmental degradation.

1. EconomicEfficiency:

In various public actions for environmental conservation, economic efficiency would be sought to be realized .^[4]

Impacts of acts of production and consumption of one party may be visited on third parties who do not have a direct economic nexus with the original act. Such impacts are termed “externalities”. If the costs (or benefits) of the externalities are not re-visited on the party responsible for the original act, the resulting level of the entire sequence of production or consumption, and externality, is inefficient. In such a situation, economic efficiency may be restored by making the perpetrator of the externality bear the cost (or benefit) of the same.

The policy will, accordingly, promote the internalization of environmental costs, including through the use of incentives based policy instruments, taking into

account the approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution, with due regard to the public interest, and without distorting international trade and investment.

b) CostMinimization:

Where the environmental benefits of a course of action cannot, for methodological or conceptual reasons, be imputed economic value (as in the case of “Incomparable Entities” [see below]), in any event the economic costs of realizing the benefits should be minimized.

Efficiency of resource use may _{also be accomplished by the use of} Efficiency of resource use may also be accomplished by the use of policy instruments that create policy instruments that create incentives to minimize wasteful use and incentives to minimise wasteful consumption of natural resources. The principle of efficiency also use and consumption of natural applies to issues of environmental governance by streamlining resources. processes and procedures in order to minimize costs and delays.

1. Entitieswith“Incomparable” Values:^[6]

Significant risks to human health, life, and environmental life-support systems, besides certain other unique natural and man-made entities, which may impact the well-being, broadly conceived, of large numbers of persons, may be considered as ”Incomparable” in that individuals or societies would not accept these risks for compensation in money or conventional goods and services. A conventional economic cost-benefit calculus would not, accordingly, apply in their case, and such entities would have priority in allocation of societal resources for their conservation without consideration of direct or immediate economic benefit .^[7]

1. Equity:

The cardinal principle of equity or justice requires that human beings cannot be treated differently based on irrelevant differences between them. Equity norms must be distinguished according to context, i.e. “procedural equity”, relating to fair rules for allocation of entitlements and obligations, and “end-result equity”, relating to fair outcomes in terms of distribution of entitlements and obligations. Each context, in addition, must be distinguished in terms of “intra-generational equity”, relating to justice within societies, and in particular, providing space for the participation of the underprivileged, and “inter-generational equity”, relating to justice between generations.

Equity, in the context of this policy refers to both equity in entitlements to, and participation of, the relevant publics, in processes of decision-making over use of environmental resources.

viii.LegalLiability:

The present environmental redressal mechanism is predominantly based on doctrines of criminal liability, which have not proved sufficiently effective, and need to be supplemented.

Civil liability for environmental damage would deter environmentally harmful actions, and compensate the victims of environmental damage. Conceptually, the principle of legal liability may be viewed as an embodiment in legal doctrine of the “polluter pays” approach, itself deriving from the principle of economic efficiency. The following alternative approaches to civil liability may apply:

a)     FaultBasedLiability

In a fault based liability regime a party is held liable if it breaches a preexisting legal duty, for example, an environmental standard.

b)    StrictLiability

Strict liability imposes an obligation to compensate the victim for harm resulting from actions or failure to take action, which may not necessarily constitute a breach of any law or duty of care¹⁰.

1. PublicTrustDoctrine:

The State is not an absolute owner, but a trustee of all natural resources, which are by nature meant for public use and enjoyment, subject to reasonable conditions, necessary to protect the legitimate interest of a large number of people, or for matters of strategic national interest.

1. Decentralization:

Decentralization involves ceding or transfer of power from a Central Authority to State and Local Authorities, in order to empower public authorities having jurisdiction at the spatial level at which particular environmental issues are salient, to address these issues.

1. Integration:

Integration refers to the inclusion of environmental considerations in sectoral policymaking, the integration of the social and natural sciences in environment related policy research, and the strengthening of relevant linkages among various agencies at the Central, State, and Local SelfGovernment levels, charged with the implementation of environmental policies.

1. EnvironmentalStandardSetting:

Environmental standards must reflect the economic and social development situation in which they apply. Standards adopted in one society or context may have unacceptable economic and social costs if applied without discrimination in another society or context.

The principle of legal liability may be viewed as an embodiment in legal doctrine of the “polluter pays” approach, itself deriving from the principle of economic efficiency.

Environmental standards must reflect the economic and social development situation in which theyapply.

It is preferable to prevent environmental damage from occurring in the first place, rather than attempting to restore d e g r a d e d e n v i ro n m e n t a l resources after thefact.

Setting environmental standards would involve several considerations, i.e. risks to human health, risks to other environmental entities, technical feasibility, costs of compliance, and strategic considerations.

xiii.PreventiveAction:

It is preferable to prevent environmental damage from occurring in the first place, rather than attempting to restore degraded environmental resources after the fact.

xiv. EnvironmentalOffsetting:

There is a general obligation to protect threatened or endangered species and natural systems that are of special importance to sustaining life, providing livelihoods, or general well-being. If for exceptional reasons of overriding public interest such protection cannot be provided in particular cases, cost-effective offsetting measures must be undertaken by the proponents of the activity, to restore as nearly as may be feasible, the lost environmental services to the same publics.

5 Strategies and Actions

The foregoing statement of policy Objectives and Principles are to be realized by concrete actions in different areas relating to key environmental challenges. A large number of such actions are currently under way, and have been for several years, in some cases, for many decades. In some aspects new themes would need to be pursued to realize the Principles and Objectives. Action plans would need to be prepared on identified themes by the concerned agencies at all levels of Government  Central, State/UT, and Local. In particular, the State and Local Governments would be encouraged to formulate their own strategies or action plans consistent with the National Environment Policy. Empowerment of Panchayats and the Urban Local Bodies, particularly, in terms of functions, functionaries, funds, and corresponding capacities, will require greater attention for operationalising some of the major provisions of this policy.

The following Strategic Themes, and outlines of actions to be taken in each, focus on both ongoing activities, functions, and roles, as well as new initiatives that are necessary. However, they are not necessarily a complete enumeration in each case.

Action plans would need to be prepared on identified themes by the concerned agencies at all levels of Government - Central, State/UT, and Local.

                                                                                                     5.1          RegulatoryReforms:

The regulatory regimes for environmental conservation comprise a legislative framework, and a set of regulatory institutions. Inadequacies in each have resulted in accelerated environmental degradation on the one hand, and long delays and high transactions costs in development projects on the other. Apart from legislation which is categorically premised on environmental conservation, a host of sectoral and cross-sectoral laws and policies, including fiscal regimes, also impact environmental quality (some of these are discussed in the succeeding sections).

5.1.1 Revisiting the Policy and Legislative Framework:

The present legislative framework is broadly contained in the umbrella Environment Protection

Act, 1986; the Water (Prevention and Control of

Pollution) Act, 1974; the Water Cess Act, 1977; and the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981. The law in respect of management of forests and biodiversity is contained in the Indian Forest Act, 1927; the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972; and the Biodiversity Act, 2002. There are several other enactments, which complement the provisions of these basic enactments.

5.1.2           ProcessRelatedReforms:

(i)       Approach:

The recommendations of the Committee on Reforming Investment Approval and Implementation Procedures (The Govindarajan Committee) which identified delays in environment and forest clearances as the largest source of delays in development projects, will be followed for reviewing the existing procedures for granting clearances and other approvals under various statutes and rules. These include the Environment Protection Act, Forest Conservation Act, the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, the Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, the Wildlife (Protection) Act, and Genetic Engineering Approval Committee (GEAC) Rules under the Environment Protection Act. The objective is to reduce delays and levels of decision-making, realize decentralization of environmental functions, and ensure greater transparency and accountability.

In addition, the following actions will be taken:

a)     In order to ensure faster decision making with greater transparency, and access to information, use of information technology based tools will be promoted, together with necessary capacity-building, under all action plans.

b)      
In order to realize greater decentralization, State level agencies may be given greater responsibility for environmental regulation and management. Such empowerment must, however, be premised on increased transparency, accountability, scientific and managerial capacity, and independence in regulatory decision making and enforcement action. Accordingly, States would be encouraged to set up Environment Protection Authorities on this basis.

c)     Mechanisms and processes would be set up to identify entities of “Incomparable Value” in different regions.

It would be ensured that all regulatory mechanisms are legally empowered to follow the principles of good

governance

(ii)     FrameworkforLegalAction:

The present approach to dealing with environmentally unacceptable behaviour in India has been largely based on criminal processes and sanctions. Although criminal sanctions, if successful, may create a deterrent impact, in reality they are rarely fruitful for a number of reasons. On the other hand, giving unfettered powers to enforcement authorities may lead to rent-seeking.

Civil law, on the other hand, offers flexibility, and its sanctions can be more effectively tailored to particular situations. The evidentiary burdens of civil proceedings are less daunting than those of criminal law. It also allows for preventive policing through orders and injunctions.

Accordingly, a judicious mix of civil and criminal processes and sanctions will be employed in the legal regime for enforcement, through a review of the existing legislation. Civil liability law, civil sanctions, and

A judicious mix of civil and criminal processes and sanctions will be employed in the legal regime for enforcement, through a reviewof theexistinglegislation.

processes, would govern most situations of non-compliance. Criminal processes and sanctions would be available for serious, and potentially provable, infringements of environmental law, and their initiation would be vested in responsible authorities. Recourse may also be had to the relevant provisions in the Indian Penal Code, and the Criminal Procedure Code. Both civil and criminal penalties would be graded according to the severity of the infraction.

5.1.3 SubstantiveReforms:

                                                            (i)          EnvironmentandForestsClearances:

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) will continue to be the principal methodology for appraising and reviewing new projects. The assessment processes are under major revision in line with the Govindarajan Committee recommendations. Under the new arrangements, there would be significant devolution of powers to the State/UT level. However, such devolution, to be effective, needs to be accompanied by adequate development of human and institutional capacities.

Further, in order to make the clearance processes more effective, the following actions will be taken:

a)      
Encourage regulatory authorities, Central and State, to institutionalize regional and cumulative environmental impact assessments (R/CEIAs) to ensure that environmental concerns are identified and addressed at the planning stage itself.

b)     Specifically assess the potential for chemical accidents of relevant projects as part of the environmental appraisal process

c)     Give due consideration, to the quality and productivity of lands which are proposed to be converted for development activities, as part of the environmental clearance process. Projects involving large-scale diversion of prime agricultural land would require environmental appraisal.

d)     Encourage clustering of industries and other development activities to facilitate setting up of environmental management infrastructure, as well as monitoring and enforcing environmental compliance. Emphasize postproject monitoring and implementation of environmental management plans through participatory processes, involving adequately empowered relevant levels of government, industry, and the potentially impacted community.

e)     Restrict the diversion of dense natural forests and areas of high endemism of genetic resources, to non-forest purposes, only to site-specific cases of vital national interest. No further regularisation of encroachment on forests should be permitted.

f)      Ensure that in all cases of diversion of forest, the essential minimum needed for the project or activity is diverted. The diverted area must not be cleared until the actual construction starts.

g)     Ensure provision for environmental restoration after decommissioning of industries, in particular mine closure in all approvals of mining plans, and institutionalise a system of post-monitoring of such projects.

h)     Formulate, and periodically update, codes of “good practices” for environmental management for different categories of regulated activities.

(ii)     CoastalAreas:

Development activities in the coastal areas are regulated by means of the Coastal Regulation Zone notifications and Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) plans made under them.

However, there is need to ensure that the regulations are firmly founded on scientific principles, including the physical, natural, and social sciences. This is necessary to ensure effective protection to valuable coastal environmental resources, without unnecessarily impeding livelihoods, or legitimate coastal economic activity, or settlements, or infrastructure development. Islands offer unique ecosystems and coastal planning and regulation in their case needs to take into account features such as their geological nature, settlement patterns, volcanic or coral nature of the island, size of the habitations, unique cultures, livelihood patterns, etc. Adequate environmental safeguards should be built into development projects in the islands, in particular those relating to tourism, high value agriculture, deep sea fishing, prospecting for oil and natural gas, etc. It is recognized that states will require both technical and financial resources for preparation of ICZM plans.

The following actions will be taken:

a)     Revisit the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) notifications to make the approach to coastal environmental regulation more holistic, and thereby ensure protection to coastal ecological systems, coastal waters, and the vulnerability of some coastal areas to extreme natural events and potential sea level rise. The Integrated Coastal Zone Management (ICZM) plans need to be comprehensive, and prepared on strong scientific basis by experts with the participation of the local communities both in formulation and implementation. The ICZM plans should be reviewed at pre-determined intervals to take account of changes in geomorphology, economic activities, settlement patterns, and coastal and marine environmental conditions.

b)     Decentralize, to the extent feasible, the clearance of specific projects to State level environmental authorities, exempting activities, which do not cause significant environmental impacts, and are consistent with approved ICZM plans.

(iii)    LivingModifiedOrganisms(LMOs):¹¹

11.               In general, Genetically Modified Organisms require evaluation of their potential benefits and risks as part of relevant regulatory processes.

The subset of LMOs, may, however, owing to their potential for replication, involve environmental concerns in addition.

(iv) EnvironmentallySensitiveZones:

Environmentally Sensitive Zones may be defined as areas with identified environmental resources having “Incomparable Values” which require special attention for their conservation.

In order to conserve and enhance these resources, without impeding legitimate socio-economic development of these areas, the following actions will be taken:

a)     Identify and give legal status to Environmentally Sensitive Zones in the country having environmental entities with “Incomparable values” requiring special conservation efforts.

b)     Formulate area development plans for these zones on a scientific basis, with adequate participation by the local communities.

c)     Create local institutions with adequate participation for the environmental management of such areas, to ensure adherence to the approved area development plans, which should be prepared in consultation with the local communities.

(v) MonitoringofCompliance:

Weak enforcement of environmental compliance is attributed to inadequate technical capacities, monitoring infrastructure, and trained staff in enforcement institutions. In addition, there is insufficient involvement of the potentially impacted local communities in the monitoring of compliance, and absence of institutionalized public-private partnerships in enhancement of monitoring infrastructure.

The following actions will be taken:

a)     Take measures, including capacity development initiatives to enable Panchayati Raj Institutions and urban local bodies to undertake monitoring of compliance with environmental management plans. Measures will also be taken to encourage municipalities to annually report their environmental performance to their governing bodies.

b)      Develop feasible models of public-private partnerships to leverage financial, technical, and management resources of the private sector in setting up and operating infrastructure for monitoring of environmental compliance, with ironclad safeguards against possible conflict of interest or collusion with the monitored entities.

(vi) UseofEconomicPrinciplesinEnvironmentalDecision-making:

It is necessary that the costs associated with the degradation and depletion of natural resources be incorporated into the decisions of economic actors at various levels, to reverse the tendency to treat these resources as “free goods” and to pass the costs of degradation to other sections of society, or to future generations of the country.

At the macro-level, a system of natural resource accounting is required to assess whether in the course of economic growth we are drawing down, or enhancing, the natural resource base of production, including relevant depletable assets. In addition, the environmental costs and benefits associated with various activities, including sectoral policies, should be evaluated to ensure that these factors are duly taken into account in decision-making.

The current near exclusive reliance on fiats based instruments for environmental regulation do not permit individual actors to minimize their own costs of compliance. This leads, on the one hand, to noncompliance in many cases, and on the other, unnecessary diversion of societal resources from other pressing needs. Economic instruments, of which a large, feasible suite, has emerged through practical experience in several developed and developing countries, work by aligning the interests of economic actors with environmental compliance,

primarily through application of “polluter pays”. This may ensure that for any given level of environmental quality desired, the society-wide costs of meeting the standard are minimized. However, in some cases, use of economic instruments may require intensive monitoring, which too may entail significant societal costs. On the other hand, use of existing policy instruments, such as the fiscal regime, may significantly reduce or eliminate the need for enhanced institutional capacities to administer the incentive based instruments. In future, accordingly, a judicious mix of incentives and fiats based regulatory instruments would be considered for each specific regulatory situation.

The following actions will be taken:

a)     Strengthen, including through capacity building, the initiatives, taken by the Central Statistical Organization in the area of natural resource accounting, with a view to its adoption in the system of national income accounts. Further strengthen in all respects, the system of collection, collation and analysis of all significant and relevant environmental monitoring data.

b)     Develop and promote the use of standardized environmental accounting practices and norms in preparation of statutory financial statements for large industrial enterprises, in order to encourage greater environmental responsibility in investment decision-making, management practices, and public scrutiny.

c)     Encourage financial institutions to adopt appropriate appraisal practices, so that environmental risks are adequately considered in the financing of projects.

d)     Facilitate the integration of environmental values into cost-benefit analysis, to encourage more efficient allocation of resources while making public investment decisions.

e)     Prepare and implement an action plan on the use of economic instruments for environmental regulation in specified contexts, including those relating to unsustainable production and consumption.

f)      Consider creation of a National Environment Restoration Fund from the net proceeds of economic instruments, user fees for access to specified natural resources, and voluntary contributions. The Fund may be used for restoration of environmental resources, including clean-up of toxic and hazardous waste legacies.

The causes of degradation of environmental resources lie ultimately in a broad range of policy, and institutional, i n c l u d i n g r e g u l a t o r y shortcomings, leading to the directcauses.

5.2.               EnhancingandConservingEnvironmentalResources:

Perverse production and consumption practices are the immediate causes of environmental degradation, but an exclusive focus on these aspects alone is insufficient to prevent environmental harm. The causes of degradation of environmental resources lie ultimately in a broad range of policy, and institutional, including regulatory shortcomings, leading to the direct causes. However, the range of policies, and legal and institutional regimes, which impact the proximate factors, is extremely wide, comprising fiscal and pricing regimes, and sectoral and cross-sectoral policies, laws, and institutions. Accordingly, apart from programmatic approaches, review and reform of these regimes to account for their environmental consequences is essential. In addition, there is lack of awareness of the causes and effects of environmental degradation, and how they may be prevented, among both specialized practitioners of the relevant professions, including policymakers, as well as the general public, which needs to be redressed. In this subsection, in respect of major categories of environmental resources, the proximate and deeper causes of their degradation, and specific initiatives for addressing them are outlined.

5.2.1 LandDegradation:

The degradation of land, through soil erosion, alkali-salinization, water logging, pollution, and reduction in organic matter content has several proximate and underlying causes. The proximate causes include loss of forest and tree cover (leading to erosion by surface water run-off and winds), unsustainable grazing, excessive use of irrigation (in many cases without proper drainage, leading to leaching of sodium and potassium salts), improper use of agricultural chemicals (leading to accumulation of toxic chemicals in the soil), diversion of animal wastes for domestic fuel (leading to reduction in soil

industrial and domestic wastes on productive land.

In addition, to such policy review, the following specific initiatives would be taken:

a)     Encourage adoption of science-based, and traditional sustainable land use practices, through research and development, extension of knowledge, pilot scale demonstrations, and large scale dissemination, including farmer's training, and where necessary, access to institutional finance.

b)     

c)     Prepare and implement thematic action plans incorporating watershed management strategies, for arresting and reversing desertification, and expanding green cover.

d)     Promote sustainable alternatives to shifting cultivation where it is no longer ecologically viable, ensuring that the culture and social organisation of the local people are not disrupted.

e)     Encourage agro-forestry, organic farming, environmentally sustainable cropping patterns, and adoption of efficient irrigation techniques.

5.2.3 ForestsandWildlife:

(i)Forests:

Forests provide a multiplicity of environmental services. Foremost among these is the recharging of mountain aquifers, which sustain our rivers. They also conserve the soil, and prevent floods and drought. They provide habitat for wildlife and the ecological conditions for maintenance and natural evolution of genetic diversity of flora and fauna. They are the homes of traditional forest dependent communities. They yield timber, fuel wood, and other forest produce, and possess immense potential for economic benefits, in particular for local communities, from sustainable eco-tourism.

On the other hand, in recent decades, there has been significant loss of forest cover, although there are now clear signs of reversal of this trend. The principal direct cause of forest loss has been the conversion of forests to agriculture, settlements, infrastructure, and industry. In addition, commercial extraction of fuelwood, illegal felling, and grazing of cattle, has degraded forests. These causes, however, have their origins in the fact that the environmental values provided by forests are not realized as direct financial benefits by various parties, at least to the extent of exceeding the monetary incomes from alternative uses, including those arising from illegal use. Moreover, while since antiquity forest dwelling communities had generally recognized traditional community entitlements over the forests, on account of which they had strong incentives to use the forests sustainably and to protect them from encroachers,

It is essential that women play a greater role in the management of natural resources.

following the commencement of formal forest laws and institutions in 1865, these entitlements were

effectively extinguished in many parts of the country. Such disempowerment has led to the forests becoming open access in nature, leading to their gradual degradation in a classic manifestation of the “Tragedy of the Commons”. It has also led to perennial conflict between the forest dependent communities and the Forest Department, constituting a major denial of justice. The Panchayats (Extension to the Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996; and the relevant provisions of

Part IX of the Constitution may provide a framework for restoration of the key traditional entitlements.

It is essential that women play a greater role in the management of natural resources. While they have to bear the burden of natural resource degradation, they have little control over the management of these resources. Relevant provisions of the National Policy for the Empowerment of Women provide a framework for incorporating elements of proposed actions.

It is possible that some site-specific non-forest activities may yield overall societal benefits significantly exceeding that from the environmental services provided by the particular tract of forest. However, large scale forest loss would lead to catastrophic, permanent change in the country's ecology, leading to major stress on water resources and soil erosion, with consequent loss of agricultural productivity, industrial potential, living conditions, and the onset of natural disasters, including drought and floods. In any event, the environmental values of converted forests must be restored, as nearly as may be feasible, to the same publics.

The National Forest Policy, 1988; and the Indian Forest Act, 1927; as well as the regulations under it, provide      a            comprehensive  basis     for        forest conservation. The National Forest Commission, set up in 2003, is reviewing the policy, legislative and institutionalbasis     of         forest    management. Nevertheless, it is necessary, looking to some of the underlying causes of forest loss, to take some further steps. These include:

(ii) Wildlife:

The status of wildlife in a region is an accurate index of the state of ecological resources, and thus of the natural resource base of human well-being. This is because of the interdependent nature of ecological entities (“the web of life”), in which wildlife is a vital link^[8]. Moreover, several charismatic species of wildlife embody “Incomparable Values”, and at the same time, comprise a major resource base for sustainable eco-tourism.

Conservation of wildlife, accordingly, involves the protection of entire ecosystems. However, in several cases, delineation of and restricting access to such Protected Areas^[9](PAs), as well as disturbance by humans on these areas has led to man-animal conflicts. While physical barriers and better policing may temporarily reduce such conflict, it is also necessary to address their underlying causes. These may largely arise from the non-involvement of relevant stakeholders in identification and delineation of PAs, as well as the loss of traditional entitlements of local people, especially tribals, over the PAs. There is also a strong need for creation of corridors to ensure proper genetic flows across habitats. Since wildlife does not remain confined to particular areas, there is also need to ensure greater protection, and habitat enhancement outside the PAs.

In respect of Wildlife Conservation, the following actions will be pursued:

a)     Expand the Protected Area (PA) network of the country, including Conservation and Community Reserves, to give fair representation to all bio-geographic zones of the country. In doing so, develop norms for delineation of PAs in terms of the Objectives and Principles of the National Environment Policy, in particular, participation of local communities, concerned public agencies, and other stakeholders, who have a direct and tangible stake in protection and conservation of wildlife, to harmonize ecological and physical features with needs of socio-economic development.

b)     Revisit the norms, criteria and needs of data for placing particular species in different schedules of the Wildlife Protection Act.

c)     Formulate and implement programs for conservation of endangered species outside protected areas, while reducing the scope for man-animal conflict.

5.2.4 Biodiversity,TraditionalKnowledge,andNaturalHeritage: Conservation of genetic diversity, is crucial for development of improved crop varieties resistant to particular stresses, new pharma products, etc., apart from ensuring the resilience of ecosystems. Traditional Knowledge (TK), referring to ethno-biology knowledge possessed by local communities, is the basis of their livelihoods, and also a potent means of unlocking the value of genetic diversity through reduction in search costs.

Natural heritage sites, including endemic “biodiversity hotspots”, sacred groves and landscapes, are repositories of significant genetic and eco-system diversity, and the latter are also an important basis for eco-tourism. They are nature's laboratories for evolution of wild species in response to change in environmental conditions.

India is fortunate in having, through the efforts of dedicated scientists over many decades,¹⁴ developed vast inventories of floral and faunal resources, as well as ethno-biology knowledge. India is, thus well-placed to tap this enormous resource base for benefits for the country as a whole, and local communities in particular, provided that the genetic resources are conserved, and appropriate Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs) conferred on local communities in respect of their ethno-biology knowledge.

A large-scale exercise has been completed for providing inputs towards a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan. These inputs would be reviewed in terms of the Objectives and Principles of National Environment Policy, scientific validity, financial and administrative feasibility, and legal aspects. In any event, the following measures would be taken:

1. For example, in institutions such as Botanical Survey of India (BSI), the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), the Bombay Natural History Society (BNHS), and others.

1. 
   The National Water Policy, 2002 prioritizes water use needs in the following order: drinking water, irrigation and agricultural use, hydropower, ecological services, industrial, navigation, and tourism.

Gangotri glacier is retreating by about 30 meters per year. Elevated global mean temperature may increase net melting rates resulting in glacial retreat and consequent adverse impact on flows in major rivers.

Rivers are also subject to siltation from sediment loads due to soil loss, itself linked to loss of forest and tree cover. They are also subject to significant net water withdrawals along their course, due to agricultural, industrial, and municipal use; as well as pollution from human and animal waste, agricultural run-offs, and industrial effluents. Although the rivers possess significant natural capacity to assimilate and render harmless many pollutants, the existing pollution inflows in many cases substantially exceed such natural capacities. This fact, together with progressive reductions in stream flows, ensures that the river water quality in the vast majority of cases declines as one goes downstream. The results include loss of aquatic flora and fauna, leading to loss of livelihoods for river fisherfolk, significant impacts on human health from polluted water, increased drudgery for poor, rural women in collecting drinking water from distant water bodies, loss of habitat for many bird species, and loss of inland navigation potential. Apart from these, India's rivers are inextricably linked with the history and religious beliefs of its peoples, and the degradation of important river systems accordingly offends their spiritual, aesthetic, and cultural sensibilities. The direct causes of river degradation are, in turn, linked to several policies and regulatory regimes. These include tariff policies for irrigation systems and industrial use, which, through inadequate costrecovery, provide incentives for overuse near the headworks' of irrigation systems, and drying up of irrigation systems at the tail-ends. This results in excessive cultivation of water intensive crops near the headworks, which may lead to inefficient water use, water logging and soil salinity and alkalinity. The irrigation tariffs also do not yield resources for proper maintenance of irrigation systems, leading to loss in their potential. In particular, resources are generally not available for lining irrigation canals to prevent seepage loss. These factors result in reduced flows in the rivers. Pollution loads are similarly linked to pricing policies leading to inefficient use of agricultural chemicals, and municipal and industrial water use. In particular, revenue yields for the latter two are insufficient to install and maintain sewage and effluent treatment plants, respectively. Pollution regulation for industries is typically not based on formal spatial planning to facilitate clustering of industries to realize scale economies in effluent treatment, resulting in relatively high costs of effluent treatment, and consequent increased incentives for non-compliance. There is, accordingly need to review the relevant pricing policy regimes and regulatory mechanisms, in terms of their likely adverse environmental impacts.

Although the rivers possess significant natural capacity to assimilate and render harmless many pollutants, the existing pollution inflows in many cases substantially exceed such natural capacities.

Pollution loads are similarly linked to pricing policies leading to inefficient use of agricultural chemicals, and municipal and industrial water use.

The following comprise elements of an action plan for river systems:

a)     Promote research in glaciology to evaluate the impacts of climate change on glaciers and river flows.

b)     Promote integrated approaches^[10]to management of river basins by the concerned river authorities, considering upstream and downstream inflows and withdrawals by season, interface between land and water, pollution loads and natural regeneration capacities, to ensure maintenance of adequate flows, in particular for maintenance of in-stream ecological values, and adherence to water quality standards throughout their course in all seasons.

c)     Consider and mitigate the impacts on river and estuarine flora and fauna, and the resulting change in the resource base for livelihoods, of multipurpose river valley projects, power plants, and industries.

d)     Consider mandating the installation of water saving closets and taps in the building bye-laws of urban centres, and other available regulatory mechanisms.

e)     Integrate conservation and wise use of wetlands into river basin management involving all relevant stakeholders, in particular local communities, to ensure maintenance of hydrological regimes and conservation of biodiversity.

f)       Incorporate a special component in afforestation programmes for afforestation on the banks and catchments of rivers and reservoirs to prevent soil erosion and improve green cover.

(ii) Groundwater:

Groundwater is present in underground aquifers in many parts of the country.

Aquifers near the surface are subject to annual recharge from precipitation, but the rate of recharge is impacted by human interference. Deep aquifers, on the other hand, occur below a substratum of hard rock. The deep aquifers generally contain very pure water, but since they are recharged only over many millennia, must be conserved for use only in periods of calamitous drought, such as may happen only once in several hundred years. The boundaries of groundwater aquifers do not generally correspond to the spatial jurisdiction of any local public authorities or private holdings, nor are they easily discernable, nor can withdrawals be easily monitored, leading to the unavoidable situation of groundwater being an open access resource.

The water table has been falling rapidly in many areas of the country in recent decades. This is largely due to withdrawal for agricultural, industrial, and urban use, in excess of annual recharge. In urban areas, apart from withdrawals for domestic and

industrial use, housing and infrastructure such as roads, prevent sufficient recharge. In addition, some pollution of groundwater occurs due to leaching of stored hazardous waste and use of agricultural chemicals, in particular, pesticides. Contamination of groundwater is also due to geogenic causes, such as leaching of arsenic and fluoride from natural deposits. Since groundwater is frequently a source of drinking water, its pollution and contamination leads to serious health impacts.

The direct causes of groundwater depletion have their origin in the pricing policies for electricity and diesel. In the case of electricity, wherever individual metering is not practiced, a flat charge for electricity connections makes the marginal cost of electricity effectively zero. Subsidies for diesel also reduce the marginal cost of extraction to well below the efficient level. Given the fact that groundwater is an open access resource, the user then “rationally” (i.e. in terms of his individual perspective), extracts groundwater until the marginal value to him equals his now very low marginal cost of extraction.¹⁷ The result is inefficient withdrawals of groundwater by all users, leading to the situation of falling water tables. Support prices for several water intensive crops with implicit price subsidies aggravate this outcome by strengthening incentives to take up these crops rather than less water intensive ones. In coastal areas this overexploitation and inadequate recharge of ground water may also cause serious problem of saline ingress, leading to adverse health impacts and loss of land productivity.

Falling water tables have several perverse social impacts, apart from the likelihood of mining of deep aquifers, “the drinking water source of last resort”. The capital costs of pump sets and bore wells for groundwater extraction when water tables are very deep may be relatively high, with no assurance that water would actually be found. In such a situation, a user who may be a marginal farmer able to borrow the money only at usurious rates of interest, may, in case water is not found, find it impossible to repay his debts. This may lead to destitution, or worse. Even if the impacts were not so dire, there would be excessive use of electricity and diesel.

The efficient use of groundwater would, accordingly, require that the practice of non-metering of electric supply to farmers be discontinued in their own enlightened self-interest. It would also be essential to progressively ensure that the environmental impacts are taken into account in setting electricity tariffs, and diesel pricing.

Increased run-off of precipitation in urban areas due to impermeable structures and infrastructure prevents natural groundwater recharge. This is an additional cause of falling water tables in urban areas as large quantities of ground water are pumped out for urban use. In rural areas several cost-effective rainwater

The direct causes of groundwater depletion have their origin in the pricing policies for electricity and diesel.

The efficient use of groundwater would, accordingly, require that the practice of non-metering of electric supply to farmers be discontinued in their own enlightenedself-interest.

17. The marginal cost of extraction equals the marginal cost to the farmer of power (“zero”) or diesel, and a small labour and depreciation cost. The capital cost of a bore well as well as the flat rate connection charge are sunk costs and do not count in the marginal cost of water.

harvesting and artificial recharge techniques have been proven to enhance groundwater recharge. A number of effective traditional water management techniques to recharge groundwater have been discontinued by the local communities due to the onset of pump sets extraction, and need to be revived. Finally, increase in tree cover, is also effective in enhancing soil moisture retention and preventing soil erosion.

Pollution of groundwater from agricultural chemicals is also linked to their improper use, once again due to pricing policies, especially for chemical pesticides, as well as agronomic practices, which do not take the potential environmental impacts into account. While transiting through soil layers may considerably eliminate organic pollution loads in groundwater, this is not true of several chemical pesticides. The pesticides themselves may become a source of pollution when it leaches into the ground water.

The following actions will be taken:

a)     Take explicit account of impacts on groundwater tables of electricity tariffs and pricing of diesel.

b)     Promote efficient water use techniques, such as sprinkler or drip irrigation, among farmers. Provide necessary pricing, inputs, and extension support to feasible and remunerative alternative crops which may be raised by efficient water use.

c)     Ensure availability of ground water potential maps through a designated institution.

d)     Support practices of rain water harvesting and artificial recharge and revival of traditional methods for enhancing groundwater recharge.

e)     Mandate water harvesting and artificial recharge in all new constructions in relevant urban areas, as well as design techniques for road surfaces and infrastructure to enhance groundwater recharge. Promote capacity development of relevant stakeholders and provide web based information on water harvesting techniques.

f)      Prepare and implement a comprehensive strategy for regulating use of ground water by large industrial and commercial establishments on the basis of a careful evaluation of aquifer capacity and annual recharge.

g)     Support R&D in cost effective techniques suitable for rural drinking water projects for remedial measures and removal of arsenic fluoride, and other toxic substances and mainstream their adoption in rural drinking water, schemes in relevant areas.

h)     Improve productivity per unit of water consumed in industrial processes, by making water assessments and water audits mandatory in identified industries and utilities.

(i)    Suitable sites for dumping the toxic waste material may be identified and remedial measures may be taken to prevent the movement of the toxic waste in the ground water.

(j)    Excessive use of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides are the main non point source of the pollution. These pollutants contribute to the pollution of the ground water as well as surface water. The optional utilization of fertilizers, pesticides and insecticides should be encouraged for improving the water quality.

(iii)Wetlands:

Wetlands^[11], natural and manmade, freshwater or brackish,           providenumerous            ecological         services. They provide habitat to aquatic flora and fauna, as wellas            numerous          speciesof         birds,    including migratory species. The density of birds, in particular, is an accurate indication of the ecological health of a particular            wetland.           Severalwetlands           have sufficiently unique ecological character as to merit international recognition as Ramsar Sites.^[12]

Wetlands also provide freshwater for agriculture, animal husbandry, and domestic use, drainage services, and provide livelihoods to fisherfolk. Larger wetlands may also comprise an important resource for sustainable tourism and recreation.^[13]

They may be employed as an alternative to power, technology, and capital intensive municipal sewage plants; however, if used for this purpose without proper reckoning of their assimilative capacity, or for dumping of solid and hazardous waste, they may become severely polluted, leading to adverse health impacts. The inadvertent introduction of some alien species of flora in wetlands^[14]have also degraded their ecology.

Wetlands are under threat from drainage and conversion for agriculture and human settlements, besides pollution. This happens because public authorities or individuals having jurisdiction over wetlands derive little revenues from them, while the alternative use may result in windfall financial gains to them. However, in many cases, the economic values of wetlands' environmental services may significantly exceed the value from alternative use. On the other hand, the reduction in economic value of their environmental services due to pollution, as well as the health costs of the pollution itself, are not taken into account while using them as a waste dump. There also does not yet exist a formal system of wetland regulation outside the international commitments made in respect of Ramsar sites. A holistic view of wetlands is necessary, which looks at each identified wetland in terms of its causal linkages with other natural entities, human needs, and its own attributes.

5.2.6 MountainEcosystems:

Mountain ecosystems play a key role in providing forest cover, feeding perennial river systems, conserving genetic diversity, and providing an immense resource base for livelihoods through sustainable tourism. At the same time, they are among the most fragile of ecosystems in terms of susceptibility to anthropogenic shocks. There has been significant adverse impact on mountain ecosystems by way of deforestation, submergence of river valleys, pollution of freshwater sources, despoliation of landscapes, degradation of human habitat, loss of genetic diversity, plantation of species not conducive to conservation of the mountain environment, retreat of glaciers, and pollution. The most significant proximate causes of these are illegal logging and commercial fuel wood collection, besides faulty construction of infrastructure, unplanned urbanization and lack of enforcement of building bye-laws, absence or disrepair of sanitation systems, setting up of polluting industries, large scale mining of low unit value minerals, climate change, and excessive use of agricultural chemicals. The underlying causes relate to absence of conducive policies to enable local communities to derive adequate financial returns from afforestation and non-consumptive use of forest resources, pricing policies for agricultural chemicals, inadequate

enforcement of pollution standards, poor institutional capacities for urban and regional planning and municipal regulatory functions, and preparation of environmental impact assessments of infrastructure; besides absence of consensus on means of financing municipal infrastructure. Clearly, there is need to address these shortcomings through review of the relevant sectoral and crosssectoral policies, and institutional capacity building.

Additionally, the following elements of an Action Plan will be taken up:

a)     Adopt appropriate land use planning and watershed management practices for sustainable development of mountain ecosystems.

b)     Adopt “best practice” norms for infrastructure construction in mountain regions to avoid or minimize damage to sensitive ecosystems and despoiling of landscapes.

c)     Encourage cultivation of traditional varieties of crops and horticulture by promotion of organic farming, enabling farmers to realize a price premium.

d)     Promote sustainable tourism through adoption of “best practice” norms for tourism facilities and access to ecological resources, and multistakeholder partnerships to enable local communities to gain better livelihoods, while leveraging financial, technical, and managerial capacities of investors.

e)     Take measures to regulate tourist inflows into mountain regions to ensure that these remain within the carrying capacity of the mountain ecology.

f)       Consider particular unique mountain scapes as entities with “Incomparable Values”, in developing strategies for their protection.

5.2.7 CoastalResources:

Coastal environmental resources comprise a diverse set of natural and manmade assets, including mangroves, coral reefs, estuaries, coastal forests, genetic diversity, sand dunes, geomorphologies, sand beaches, land for agriculture and human settlements, coastal infrastructure, and heritage sites. These provide habitats for marine species, which, in turn comprise the resource base for large numbers of fisherfolk, protection from extreme weather events, a resource base for sustainable tourism, and agricultural and urban livelihoods. In recent years there has been significant degradation of coastal resources, for which the proximate causes include poorly planned human settlements, improper location of industries and infrastructure, pollution from industries and settlements, and overexploitation of living natural resources. In the future, sea level rise due to climate change may have major adverse impacts on the coastal environment. The deeper causes of these proximate factors lie in inadequate institutional capacities for, and participation of local communities in, formulation

and implementation of coastal management plans, the open access nature of many coastal resources, and lack of consensus on means of provision of sanitation and waste treatment.

The following further actions will be taken up:

a)     Mainstream the sustainable management of mangroves into the forestry sector regulatory regime, ensuring that they continue to provide livelihoods to local communities.

b)     Disseminate available techniques for regeneration of coral reefs, and support activities based on application of such techniques.

c)     Explicitly consider sea-level rise and vulnerability of coastal areas to climate change and geological events, in coastal management plans, as well as infrastructure planning and construction norms.

d)     Adopt a comprehensive approach to Integrated Coastal Management by addressing linkages between coastal areas, wetlands, and river systems, in relevant policies, regulation, and programs.

e)      Develop a strategy for strengthening regulation, and addressing impacts, of ship-breaking activities on human health, and coastal and near marine resources.

5.2.8 PollutionAbatement:

The direct causes of air pollution are emissions from the use of fossil energy, and other industrial processes, and some consumption activities. The deeper causes arise in a multiplicity of policy, and institutional, including regulatory shortcomings, in particular, inefficient pricing of fossil fuel based energy. Indoor air pollution, a special case, arises from the low societal status of women, leading to continued use of polluting, inefficient biomass stoves, besides pricing policies for agricultural chemicals which lead to substitution of biomass based fertilizer by chemicals, the biomass then being used inefficiently as fuel. These deeper causes need to be addressed through policies and programmes for redressing women's status, and dialogue aimed at consideration of the environmental impacts of pricing policies for agricultural chemicals.

In addition, the following specific actions will be taken:

a)     Take an integrated approach to energy conservation and adoption of renewable energy technologies, including hydropower, by appropriately linking efforts to improve conversion, transmission, distribution, and end-use efficiency, and R&D in, and dissemination of renewable energy technologies. Remove policy, legal, and regulatory barriers to setting up decentralized generation and distribution systems for power and other secondary energy forms, based on local primary energy resources.

b)     Accelerate the national programmes of dissemination of improved fuelwood stoves, and solar cookers, suited to local cooking practices and biomass resources.

c)     Strengthen the monitoring and enforcement of emission standards for both point and non-point sources.

d)     Prepare and implement action plans for major cities for addressing air pollution for both point and non-point sources, relying on a judicious combination of fiats and incentive based instruments.

e)     Formulate a national strategy for urban transport to ensure adequate investment, public and private, in lowpollution mass transport systems.

f)      Promote reclamation of wastelands by energy plantations for rural energy through multistakeholder partnerships involving the land owning agencies, local communities, and investors.

g)     Strengthen efforts for partial substitution of fossil fuels by bio-fuels, through promotion of biofuels plantations, promoting relevant research and development, and streamlining regulatory certification of the new technologies.

(ii)WaterPollution:

The direct and indirect causes of pollution of surface (river, wetlands) water sources, groundwater, and coastal areas have been discussed above.

The following comprise further elements of an action plan:

a)      Develop and implement, initially on a pilot scale, public-private partnership models for setting up and operating effluent and sewage treatmentplants.  Once    the        modelsare validated, progressively use public resources, including external assistance, to catalyze such partnerships.Enhance           the        capacities          of municipalities for recovery of user charges for water and sewage systems.

b)      Prepare and implement action plans for major cities         for        addressing        water    pollution, comprising regulatory systems relying on a appropriate combination of fiats and incentive based instruments, projects implemented through public agencies as well as public-private partnerships for treatment, reuse, and recycle where applicable, of sewage and wastewater from municipal and industrial sources, before final discharge to water bodies.

c)      Take measures to prevent pollution of water bodies from other sources, especially waste disposal on lands.

d)      Enhance capacities for spatial planning among the State and Local Governments, with adequate participation by local communities, to ensure clustering of polluting industries to facilitate setting up of common effluent treatment plants, to be operated on cost recovery basis. Ensure that legal entity status is available for common effluent treatment plants to facilitate investments, and enable enforcement of standards.

e)      Promote R&D in development of low cost technologies for sewage treatment at different scales, in particular, replication of the East Kolkata wetlands and other bio-processing based models for sewage treatment, to yield multiple benefits.

f)      Take explicit account of groundwater pollution in pricing policies of agricultural inputs, especially pesticides, and dissemination of agronomy practices. Encourage Integrated Pest Management (IPM) and use of biodegradable pesticides.

(iii)SoilPollution:

Similarly, the immediate and deeper causes of soil pollution have been considered above. Management of industrial and municipal waste is the major cause of soil pollution and is a serious challenge in terms of magnitude and required resources.

An Action Plan will comprise:

a)      Develop and implement viable models of public-private partnerships for setting up and operating secure landfills, incinerators, and other appropriate techniques for the treatment and disposal of toxic and hazardous waste, both industrial and biomedical, on payment by users, taking the concerns of local communities into account. The concerned local communities and State Governments must have clear entitlements to specified benefits from hosting such sites, if access is given to non-local users. Develop and implement strategies for clean up of toxic and hazardous waste dump legacies, in particular in industrial areas, and abandoned mines, and reclamation of such lands for future, sustainable use.

b)      Survey and develop a national inventory of toxic and hazardous waste dumps, and an online monitoring system for movement of hazardous wastes. Strengthen capacities of institutions responsible for monitoring and enforcement in respect of toxic and hazardous wastes.

c)      Strengthen         the        legal     arrangements    and response     measures          for        addressing emergenciesarising  out       oftransportation, handling, and disposal of hazardous wastes, as part of the chemical accidents regime.

d)      Strengthen the capacities of local bodies for segregation,  recycling,         and       reuse    of municipal solid wastes- recognizing inter-alia thepositiveimpactsit          may      have     on        the welfare of safai-karamcharis, and setting up and operating sanitary landfills, in particular throughcompetitive       outsourcing       of         solid waste management services.

e)      Give legal recognition to, and strengthen the informal sector systems of collection and recycling of various materials. In particular enhance their access to institutional finance and relevant technologies.

f)      Promote organic farming of traditional crop varieties through research in and

dissemination of techniques for reclamation of land with prior exposure to agricultural chemicals, facilitating marketing of organic produce²⁴ in India and abroad, including by development of transparent, voluntary, science-based labelling schemes.

g)      Promote biodegradable and recyclable substitutes for non-biodegradable materials, and develop and implement strategies for their recycle, reuse, and final environmentally benign disposal, including through promotion of relevant technologies, and use of incentive based instruments.

h)      Develop and enforce regulations and guidelines for management of e-waste, as part of the hazardous waste regime.

i)       Promote, through incentives, removal of barriers, and regulation, the beneficial utilisation of generally nonhazardous waste streams such as fly ash, bottom ash, red mud, and slag, including in cement and brick making, and building railway and highway embankments.

24.         There is considerable evidence of consumer preference for organic produce, which thereby may command a substantial premium.

(iv)NoisePollution:

Persistent exposure to elevated noise levels has been established to result in significant adverse health impacts. While in many instances, the identification of a particular sound as “noise” is unambiguous, in the case of others, such as “music” or “chanting” or “fireworks displays”, it is inherently subjective. In all such cases, societal well-being would require that exposure levels to third parties be maintained below levels at which significant adverse health impacts may occur. At the same time, it needs to be understood that certain environments in which people choose to live and work necessarily involve a certain level of noise.

5.2.9 ConservationofManmadeHeritage:

Manmade heritage reflects the prehistory, history, ways of living, and culture, of a people. In the case of India, such heritage is at the core of our national identity. At the same time, considerable economic value, and livelihoods may be derived from conservation of manmade heritage and their sustainable use, through realization of their tourism potential.

The criteria for, and processes of identification of heritage sites, besides legislation and fiscal measures to ensure that they are not damaged or converted by direct human interference, are outside the scope of the National Environment Policy. However, the impact of environmental quality on their conservation is an environmental policy concern. Heritage sites may be impacted by pollution, or they may face threats of inundation or conversion by development projects. Several prominent heritage sites may be held to possess “Incomparable Values”.

The following action points will be pursued:

a)      In setting ambient environmental standards, especially for air quality, the potential impacts on designated heritage sites must be taken into account.

b)     Heritage sites considered to have “Incomparable Values” would merit stricter standards than otherwise comparable situations, and particular attention should be paid to monitoring and enforcement of environmental standards in their case. Integrated regional development plans should be drawn up, with participation of the local community, to shift polluting activities or render them much less polluting, to treat waste streams, to review transportation options, and adopt building norms which maintain the overall heritage ambience of the area.

c)      Impacts on designated heritage sites must be considered at the stage of developing the terms of reference for environmental impact assessments of projects, and consideration given to the potential impacts during appraisal, in terms of the Objectives and Principles of the National Environment Policy.

5.2.10 ClimateChange:

Climate change, resulting from anthropogenic emissions of a suite of gases (called “greenhouse gases” or GHGs) due to fossil fuel use, certain agricultural and industrial activities, and deforestation, leading to their increasing concentrations in the atmosphere, has the potential, over the next few generations, to significantly alter global climate. This would result in large changes in ecosystems, leading to possibly catastrophic disruptions of livelihoods, economic activity, living conditions, and human health. On the other hand, abatement of GHGs, would involve significant economic costs.

While climate change is a global environmental issue, different countries bear different levels of responsibility for increase in atmospheric GHGs concentrations. Further, the adverse impacts of climate change will fall disproportionately on those who have the least responsibility for causing the problem, in particular, developing countries, including India.

India's GHG emissions in 1994 were 1228 million ton (Mt) CO₂ equivalent^[17], which is below 3% of global GHG emissions. In per-capita terms, it is 23 per cent of the global average, and 4 per cent of USA, 8 per cent of Germany, 9 per cent of UK, and 10 per cent of Japan, per capita emissions in 1994. In terms of the GHG intensity of the economy, in Purchasing Power Parity terms, India emitted a little above 0.4 ton CO equivalent per 1000 US dollars in₂

2002, which is lower than the global average. In terms of primary energy use, India's share of renewable energy (being a nonGHG emitting energy form) at 36 per cent is far higher than industrialized countries can hope to reach in many decades. Since GHG emissions are directly linked to economic activity, India's economic growth will necessarily involve increase in GHG emissions from the current extremely low levels. Any constraints on the emissions of GHG by India, whether direct, by way of emissions targets, or indirect, will reduce growth rates.

On the other hand, India's policies for sustainable development, by way of promotion of energy efficiency, appropriate mix of fuels and primary energy sources including nuclear, hydro and renewable sources, energy pricing, pollution abatement, afforestation, mass transport, besides differentially higher growth rates of less energy intensive services sectors as compared to manufacturing, results in a relatively GHGs benign growth path.

Anthropogenic climate change, significant responsibility for which clearly does not lie with India or other developing countries, may, on the other hand, have likely adverse impacts on India's precipitation patterns, ecosystems, agricultural potential, forests, water resources, coastal and marine resources, besides increase in range of several disease vectors. Large-scale resources would clearly be required for adaptation measures for climate change impacts, if catastrophic human misery is to be avoided. Accordingly, the following will comprise essential elements of India's response to climate change:

a)  Adherence to the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities of differentcountries in respect of both mitigation of GHGs, and adaptation measures.

b)  Reliance on multilateral approaches, as opposed to bilateral or plurilateral or unilateral measures.

c)  Equal per-capita entitlements of global environmental resources to all countries.

d)  Over-riding priority of the right to development.

e)  Identify key vulnerabilities of India to climate change, in particular impacts on water resources, forests, coastalareas, agriculture, and health.

f)   Assess the need for adaptation to future climate change, and the scope for incorporating these in relevant programmes, including watershed management, coastal zone planning and regulation, forestry management, agricultural technologies and practices, and health programmes.

g)  Encourage Indian Industry to participate in the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) through capacitybuilding for identifying and preparing CDM projects, including in the financial sector.

h)  Participate in voluntary partnerships with other countries both developed and developing, to address thechallenges of sustainable development and climate change, consistent with the provisions of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.

5.3        EnvironmentalStandards,ManagementSystems,Certification, andIndicators:

26. Environmental quality is not the only source of societal risk; virtually every activity of humans is fraught with risk. Other sources of risk, which may be regulated, include safety standards for vehicles, aircraft, water, food and pharma, contagious diseases (quarantine and immunizations), etc. Risk mitigation in each case involves societal costs; these must be weighed against the potential benefits.

The tendency to prescribe specific abatement technologies should also be eschewed, since these may unnecessarily increase the unit and societal costs of achieving the ambient environmental quality.

Specific considerations for setting ambient standards in each category of location (residential, industrial, environmentally sensitive zones, etc.) include the reductions in potential aggregate health risks (morbidity and mortality combined in a single measure^[18]) to the exposed population; the risk to sensitive, valuable ecosystems and manmade assets; and the likely societal costs, of achieving the proposed ambient standard.

Similarly, emissions standards for each class of activity need to be set on the basis of general availability of the required technologies,^[19]the feasibility of achieving the applicable environmental quality standards at the location (specific or category) concerned with the proposed emissions standards, and the likely unit costs of meeting the proposed standard. It is also important that the standard is specified in terms of quantities of pollutants that may be emitted, and not only by concentration levels, since the latter can often be easily met through dilution, with no actual improvement in ambient quality. The tendency to prescribe specific abatement technologies should also be eschewed, since these may unnecessarily increase the unit and societal costs of achieving the ambient environmental quality, and in any case because a technology that is considered ideal for meeting a given emission standard may not be acceptable on other relevant parameters, including possibly other sources of societal risk.

The following specific actions will be taken:

a)     Set up a permanent machinery comprising experts in all relevant disciplines to review notified ambient and emissions standards in the light of new scientific and technological information as they become available, and changing national circumstances, ensuring adequate participation by potentially impacted communities, and industry associations.

b)      Strengthen the testing infrastructure and network for monitoring ambient environmental quality, including through participation by local communities, and public-private partnerships. Progressively ensure real-time, and on-line availability of the monitoring data.

                                                            5.3.2         Environmental       Management       Systems,      Ecolabeling      and

Certification:

Environmental Management Systems (EMS), such as ISO 14000, by requiring the     adoption           of         standardized     environmental   management     practices, documenting their actual use, and credible third party verification of the fact, may significantly ease the public burden of monitoring and enforcement of prescribed emissions standards. On the other hand, their adoption may involve transaction costs, which, for small and medium enterprises may be significant in relation to their total investment. Global harmonization of EMS^[20], however, is a safeguard against adoption of arbitrary national EMS regimes to serve as non-tariff barriers.

Ecolabeling (and other voluntary certification mechanisms) differ from the EMS in that they address the preferences of environmentally conscious consumers, rather than ensuring adherence to national environmental standards. They may involve review of the entire product cycle, from sourcing raw materials, to final disposal of the product after use, and since they are concerned primarily with consumer preferences, may relate to external or ad-hoc, rather than national environmental standards. Further, at present, nonpublic bodies have established several labeling schemes in India's export destinations, with no satisfactory evidence of being based on scientific knowledge, or participation by the potentially affected producers. Moreover, they may be based on prescriptions of production processes, and not only of the product characteristics, and for this reason, their mandatory application is inconsistent with provisions of the WTO regime.

Ecolabels, etc., clearly have the potential to be employed as trade barriers, at least by competing firms in the export destinations, if not directly by their Governments. The obtaining of an ecolabel, especially one granted by an agency located in a developed country, may involve large transactions costs. However, ecolabeled products may command significant price premia, as well as ease of entry to markets. On the other hand, the fact of a large, rapidly growing, environmentally conscious consumer base in India itself, may provide the required leverage to realize significant advantages from mutual recognition of ecolabeling schemes.

The following actions will be taken:

a)     Encourage industry associations to promote the adoption of ISO 14000 among their members, through provision of technical and training support. Mainstream promotion of ISO 14000 in the small-scale sector in the various promotion schemes for the sector.

b)     Encourage adoption of EMS through purchase preference for ISO 14000 goods and services for Government procurement, except for items reserved for the small-scale sector at any given time. Mandate ISO 14000 when a sufficient number of domestic suppliers for each good or service have ISO 14000 certification.^[21]

c)     Formulate “Good Practice Guidelines” for ecolabels to enhance their scientific basis, transparency, and requirements of participation. Promote the mutual recognition of Indian and foreign ecolabels, which adhere to the Good Practice Guidelines, to ensure that Indian exporters enhance their market access at lower costs.

5.4 CleanTechnologiesandInnovation:

Clean technologies, as distinct from “end-of-pipe” abatement technologies minimize the generation of waste streams in the production processes and utilize waste from other consumption goods and production processes, rather than treating the waste after generation. In general, clean technologies are less intensive in use of raw materials and energy, than conventional technologies, which rely on pollution abatement after generation. For this reason, they may also offer significant cost advantages to the producer.

Barriers to the adoption of clean technologies are, first, the fact that many of them are proprietary, and protected by strong patent regimes held abroad. The vendors, accordingly, would be able to extract large premiums in the absence of competitive substitutes. In such cases a project specific approach will be adopted in respect of enhancing

market access. Second, lack of capacity in development financial institutions for appraisal of proposals for switching existing production facilities to clean technologies. Third, the lack of coordination in R&D efforts in India aimed at developing a shelf of commercially viable clean technologies. The last should also be viewed against the fact that in future, almost all commercial transfers of production technology worldwide may be for clean technologies.

The following will comprise elements of an Action Plan:

a)     Encourage capacity building in the financial sector for appraising clean technology switchover project proposals.

b)     Set up a mechanism to network technology research institutions in the country, public and private, for cooperation in technology research and development and adaptation, information, and evaluation of clean technologies. Create a database of such technologies, and promote dissemination of new technologies developed both in India and abroad.

c)     Consider use of revenue enhancing fiscal instruments to promote shifts to clean technologies in both existing and new units.

d)     Promote adoption of clean technologies by industry, in particular in the small and medium sector, through regulatory and fiscal measures, and standards setting.

5.5 Environmental Awareness, Education, andInformation:

Enhancing environmental awareness is essential to harmonize patterns of individual behaviour with the requirements of environmental conservation. This would minimize the demands placed on the monitoring and enforcement regimes; in fact, largescale non-compliance would simply overwhelm any feasible regulatory machinery. Awareness relates to the general public, as well as specific sections, e.g. the youth, adolescents, urban dwellers, industrial and construction workers, municipal and other public employees, etc. Awareness involves not only internalization of environmentally responsible behaviour, but also enhanced understanding of the impacts of irresponsible actions, including to public health, living conditions, sanitation, and livelihood prospects.

Environmental education is the principal means of enhancing such awareness, both among the public at large, and among focused groups. Such education may be formal, or informal, or a combination of both. It may rely on educational institutions at different levels; the print, electronic, or live media; and various other formal and informal settings. Several steps to expand and enrich the content of the environment awareness and education programmes have been taken. The Supreme Court has also mandated that environmental education must be imparted at all levels, including higher education in the formal system. However, there is need for further strengthening the existing programmes and making them more inclusive and participatory.

Access to environmental information is the principal means by which environmentally conscious stakeholders may evaluate compliance by the concerned parties with environmental standards, legal requirements, and covenants. They would thereby be enabled to stimulate necessary enforcement actions, and through censure, motivate compliance. Access to information is also necessary to ensure effective, informed participation by potentially impacted publics in various consultation processes, such as for preparation of environmental impact assessments, and environment management plans of development projects.

The National Natural Resources Management System (NNRMS) was set up in 1983 for optimally managing the natural resources and environment of the country using an optimal mix of remote sensing and conventional techniques. Remote Sensing and data, both satellite and aerial, is being used extensively in the country for mapping and managing the natural resources and environment, over the past three decades.

Access to environmental information is the principal means by which environmentally conscious stakeholders may evaluate compliance by the c o n c e r n e d p a r t i e s w i t h environmental standards, legal requirements, and covenants.

The following actions will be taken:

a)     Develop and operate an online, real time, publicly accessible environmental information system to provide all relevant information on key environmental resources and parameters, including ambient quality, as well as major point sources of pollution, and make archival data available in convenient format.

b)     Further promote the use of Remote Sensing data to provide valuable inputs on the extent and quality of forests, wildlife habitats, biodiversity, wastelands, wetlands, groundwater, deserts, rivers, etc., and monitor pollution and its impacts.

c)     Mainstream scientifically valid environment content in the curricula of formal education, at primary, secondary, tertiary, and professional levels, focusing on the content appropriate at each stage, and without increasing the course load overall, besides non-formal programmes, such as adult education. Special midcareer training programmes may be conducted for groups with special responsibilities, e.g. the judiciary, policy makers, legislators, industrial managers, city and regional planners, and voluntary and community based organizations.

d)      Prepare and implement a strategy for enhancing environmental awareness among the general public, and special groups, by professional production and airing of information products through diverse media catering to the different target groups. The media products should, as far as possible, eschew focusing on the achievements of public agencies, but instead document real world events of human interest. The production, as well as dissemination may involve public, private, and voluntary agencies. Ensure that adequate financial resources are available for the purpose.

5.6 PartnershipsandStakeholderInvolvement:

Conservation of the environment requires the participation of multiple stakeholders, who may bring to bear their respective resources, competencies, and perspectives, so that the outcomes of partnerships are superior to those of each acting alone. Implementing and policy making agencies of the Government, at Central, State, Municipal, and Panchayat levels; the legislatures and judiciary; the public and private corporate sectors; financial institutions; industry associations; academic and research institutions; independent professionals and experts; the media; youth clubs; community based organizations; voluntary organizations; and multilateral and bilateral development partners, may each play important roles in partnerships for the formulation, implementation, and promotion of measures for environmental conservation.

Institutions of local self-government have an important role in management of the environment and natural resources. The 73^rd and 74^th

Constitutional amendments provide the framework for their empowerment. Further policy and legislative changes are necessary to enable them to actually realize such a role, and participate in various partnerships in this context.

A number of specific themes for partnerships have been identified above. A generic classification of some, not exhaustive, possible partnerships is as follows:

a)      Public-Community Partnerships, by which public agencies and local communities cooperate in the management of a given environmental resource, each partner bringing agreed resources, assuming specified responsibilities, and with defined entitlements, e.g. Joint Forestry Management.

b)      Public-Private Partnerships, by which specified public functions with respect to environmental management are contracted out competitively to private providers, e.g. monitoring of environmental quality.

c)      Public-Community-Private Partnerships, in terms of which the partners assume joint responsibility for a particular environmental function, with defined obligations and entitlements for each, with competitive selection of the private sector partner, e.g. afforestation of degraded forests.

d)      Public-Voluntary Organization Partnerships, similar to public-private partnerships, in respect of functions in which voluntary organizations may have a comparative advantage over others, the voluntary organizations, in turn, being selected competitively, e.g. environmental awareness raising.

e)      Public-Private-Voluntary            Organization Partnerships,         in         which   the        provision          of specified       public   responsibilities  is accomplished on competitive basis by the private sector, and the provision is monitored by           competitively    selectedvoluntary organizations, e.g. “Build, Own, Operate” sewage and effluent treatment plants.

f)       It is also essential that all partnerships are

realized through, and are carried out in terms of the principles of good governance, in particular, transparency, accountability, cost effectiveness, and efficiency.

g)      Youth constitute the most vibrant segment of the country's population. Their strength needs to be harnessed and channelised in protection and conservation of environment. They also need to be involved in relevant stakeholder participation.

5.7 CapacityBuilding:

The multi-stakeholder character of environmental issues and continuous developments in the field of environment, make it necessary to have a continuing focus on capacity building in all concerned institutions: public, private, voluntary, academic, research, and the media.

The following actions are necessary:

a)     Review the present institutional capacities at the Central and State levels, in respect of enforcement of environmental laws and regulations. Prepare and implement suitable programs for enhancement of the capacities, as required.

b)     Incorporate in all environmental programmes a capacity development component, with sufficient earmarked funds.

c)     Ensure continuous upgradation of knowledge and skills of the scientific and technical personnel involved in environmental management in public institutions at all levels: Central, State, and Local, through dedicated capacity building programs.

5.8 ResearchandDevelopment:

In order to rapidly advance scientific understanding of environmental issues, it is necessary to promote properly focussed research by competent institutions. A continuous engagement with the scientific community, in government, academic, and private institutions, will provide important insights for policy making and regulation, including in the field of multilateral negotiations, and help realize deeper and broader skills in the scientific community.

Key areas of research are as follows (not in order of priority, which is changeable over time):

• Taxonomies of living natural resources.
• Research           leadingto         better    understanding   of         ecological         processes          and pathways.
• Research which provides direct inputs to policy making.
• R&D in technologies for environmental management and clean production.

The following actions would be taken:

a)     Periodically identify and prioritize areas for research.

b)     Establish a research programme in priority areas within the Government, with expected outputs clearly specified.

c)     Encourage research in priority areas outside the Government, with necessary financial and institutional support.

5.9        InternationalCooperation:

India has participated in major international events on the environment, since 1972. The country has contributed to, and ratified several key multilateral agreements on environmental issues in recognition of the transboundary nature of several environmental problems, and has complied with its commitments. It has also participated in numerous regional and bilateral programs for environmental cooperation. Given the need to enhance our own capacities to comply with our commitments, and ensure sustained flows of resources for environmental management, the following steps would be taken:

5.10     ReviewofthePolicy:

We live in a rapidly changing global community, in a rapidly developing, highly diverse country. The environmental issues that are salient as of now may evolve over time, and new ones may take their place. Scientific understanding of environmental matters would advance rapidly. Changes in economic structure, technologies, resource availability, in each case nationally as well as globally, are likely, as are evolution of global environmental regimes, and norms arising from jurisprudence.

To set forth an immutable National Environment Policy in this dynamic situation would be unwise. A prudent course would be to provide for updating every few years in light of new knowledge and developments, and a comprehensive review in about a decade.

The following provisions are, accordingly made for review, updating, and renewal of the National Environment Policy:

a)     Undertake consultations every three years with groups of diverse stakeholders, i.e. researchers and experts, community based organizations, industry associations, and voluntary organizations, and update the National Environment Policy.

b)      In the third of the three-year reviews, undertake a more comprehensive examination of the scientific and policy understanding of environmental issues, redefine the Objectives and Principles, and recast the Strategic Themes for Action. A new National Environment Policy should be the outcome.

5.11 ReviewofImplementation:

Any policy is only as good as its implementation. The National Environment Policy outlines a significant number of new and continuing initiatives for enhancing environmental conservation. These require the coordinated actions of diverse actors, for the major part organized and stimulated by one or more public agencies.

While coordination and review mechanisms are necessary in respect of the individual action plans under each of the strategic themes at relevant operational levels, a formal, periodic high level review of implementation of the different elements of the National Environment Policy is essential. This would enhance accountability of the different public agencies responsible for implementation. It would also reveal practical issues in implementation, including absence of political will at concerned levels, or official indifference.

Accordingly, the Cabinet or a nominated Committee of the Cabinet may be requested to review the implementation of the National Environment Policy, once a year, within three months from the close of the previous fiscal year. The findings of the review should be publicly disclosed, so that stakeholders are assured of the seriousness of the Government in ensuring implementation of the Policy.